« Phonebanking for Kerry · Main · Have a passport? You are probably a Democrat. »

October 18, 2004

Hemachandra numbers everywhereLiterature

Supplesomething forwarded me an interesting NPR piece on Manjul Bhargava, 28, a professor of number theory at Princeton who discusses how the Fibonacci series pops up not just in mathematics but also in the arts.

The Fibonacci series is the set of numbers beginning with 1, 1 where every number is the sum of the previous two numbers. The series begins with 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, and so on. They were known in India before Fibonacci as the Hemachandra numbers. And the ratio of any two successive Fibonacci numbers approximates a ratio, ~1.618, called the golden section or golden mean.

It's long been known that the Fibonacci series turns up frequently in nature. The numbers of petals on a daisy and the dimensions of a section of a spiral nautilus shell are usually Fibonacci numbers. For plants, this is because the fractional part of the golden mean, a constant called phi (0.618), is the rotation fraction (222.5 degrees) which yields the most efficient and scalable packing of circular objects such as seeds, petals and leaves.

But Bhargava points out that the series also shows up in the arts. Sanksrit poetry, tabla compositions and tango, to name a few examples, use the series to find the number of possible combinations of single and double-length beats within a stanza.

For example, the eighth Fibonacci number is 34, assuming we number the series starting from 0. There are 34 ways to combine single and double-syllable words in a stanza with eight beats. Similarly, there are 34 ways to combine fast and slow tango steps over eight beats. It's classic Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: the beauty in logic, the logic in beauty.

If Hemachandra were alive today, no doubt he'd apply his series to how many Indian bureaucrats it takes to sell a railway ticket. In the first year, one; in the ninth, 55, and so on.

manish on October 18, 2004 01:35 PM in Literature, Music, Science · T·r·a·c·k·b·a·c·k address · Direct link · Email post



5 comments

 1 · brimful on October 18, 2004 01:58 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

I heard this piece on NPR this morning! My favorite Bhargava moment was his explanation of the inherent artistry of mathematics, that mathematics and the arts pursue an attempt to present the truth in some crystallizing manner. I'm such a sucker for nerds...


 2 · prakruti on October 18, 2004 04:07 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

thanks Manish for blogging on this.
Dan Brown wrote in detail about significance of fibonacci numbers in his novel "Davinci code" ( which is a good novel connecting fibanaci numbers to maths,science, art davincis paintings etc.,) .. very interesting book.
check these sites out.
http://goldennumber.net/
http://websearch.cs.com/cs/browse?id=323765&source=CSBrowse


 3 · O. P. SIKHWAL on December 22, 2004 11:08 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Thanks Manishji for new information about fibonacci no.
I agree with you about new information, but pls inform me the source from which you have collected the information. So we can furnish all details & can prove this no. had invented in India.
Pls response early.


 4 · Vijay hinge on March 17, 2005 05:48 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

It is really very interesting.Mr. o. p. sikhwal tell me about this no.I want to know applications of this no. in daily life.


 5 · sowmya on December 10, 2007 01:02 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

A very good article on fibonacci numbers.few would have known that these numbers were already known in India as Hemachangra numbers.


Add a comment
         
 
   
   
 
Remember me?   

To prevent comment spam, please type the word brown below:


Note: Please don't feed the trolls. Requests for celebrities' contact info or homework assistance; racist, abusive, illiterate, content-free or commercial comments; personal, non-issue-focused flames; intolerant or anti-secular comments; and long, obscure rants may be deleted. Unless they’re funny. It’s all good then.

   
If you don't see your comment yet:
Wait 15 seconds and refresh your browser, don't post a duplicate.