A Bombay policeman allegedly raped a girl in broad daylight (via India Uncut):
A quiet evening, sitting by the sea at Marine Drive turned into a nightmare for a 17-year-old girl. Priya Ravi (name changed), a resident of Chembur, was just idling at the promenade along with three male friends last evening, when constable Sunil More… approached them… he demanded that they come to the police chowky… Inside, he bolted the door and allegedly raped her…More… was completely nonchalant and allegedly said, “Jo ukhad sakte ho, ukhad lo (do whatever you want)…” According to Kayum Shaikh who was present at the spot, “The constable was drunk and came out of the chowky adjusting his belt. He was aggressive and appeared completely unconcerned with what had just happened.” [Mid-Day]
Police sources said More always got away with rude behaviour and drinking on duty because his brother-in-law, a police inspector in the Crime Branch, shielded him. [Express]
The cop’s been fired and charged with a crime, but only because of public outrage. Says Amit Varma:
I’m just surprised that the boys who were with that girl let the policeman take her inside that chowky. Perhaps they were young and naive. In time, they will learn that the typical Indian policeman is like this: undereducated, overworked, underpaid, sexually repressed, resentful of richer people, and drunk on power. It is a potent combination.
An even worse incident happened in Pakistan:
Ms Bhatti, a first-year college student, said she was abducted from Sialkot, an industrial city south-east of the capital, last month and held in captivity for several days. She said she was gang-raped repeatedly by her abductors for three weeks. Ms Bhatti said she managed to escape and reached a police station to report the crime. But two of the policemen on duty also raped her, she said. [BBC]
Think about the retrograde psychology here: she’s no longer pure in society’s eyes, therefore no harm would befall them if they violated her again.
… [Nazish Bhatti] threatened yesterday to set herself on fire in front of parliament if the officers were not charged. [Herald]



