« Some Folks are Just Too Sensitive · Main · If not Torino, then where? »

January 21, 2006

A knight’s taleFilm

There comes a time in every knighted actor’s career when he descends from Oscar material to B-level creature feature. Ben Kingsley is the vampire king in Bloodrayne, yet another awful flick derived from a video game. After playing Fagin, he’s well into his monster oeuvre:

I vant to suck

German director Uwe Boll (“House of the Dead,” “Alone in the Dark”) is fast becoming known as one of the worst directors on the planet. Indeed, Boll’s films are archetypes of bad filmmaking… Yet he continues to license big-name videogame titles and turn them into movies with ever more impressive casts… Boll somehow lures an Oscar-nominated Knight of the British Order to play a character as ridiculous as the King of the Vampires. [Link]

If I wanted to watch a desi actor draining the life out of his victims, I’d go down to the local Bollyplex.

The video game: sex, death and subtlety

Related post: Monster’s ball

manish on January 21, 2006 11:49 AM in Film · T·r·a·c·k·b·a·c·k address · Direct link · Email post



17 comments

 1 · Vikram on January 21, 2006 12:18 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

I think Ben has beaten Rex Harrison's appearance in "Shalimar" as the worst career move for an Oscar award winning actor...Brando's Dr. Moreau does bear honorable mention.


 2 · Dash Riprock on January 21, 2006 01:03 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

I am in Sundance right now...great desi films being played. Also, Ben Kingsley was supposed to be the George Rush role in Munich, but schedule did not permit it...guess Sir Ben had to do the horror flick!


 3 · huh? on January 21, 2006 09:27 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Ben Kingsley is desi? Really? I thought he was just a white actor who played Gandhi.


 4 · Bong Breaker on January 21, 2006 09:55 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Yeah he's half desi huh.

You know I love the Mutiny, but when you post about Ben Kingsley, I think it's a bit weird. He's the most un-Indian half-Indian I know. If he hadn't played Gandhi, barely anyone would know about his heritage. Well no - you can post about whoever you like, but referring to him as a 'desi actor' just seems odd. He's never categorically said he's ashamed of his Indian roots, but he's never talked about them at all, which is perhaps why I have a mental impression he's not that proud of them. I could be wrong.


 5 · Nux2 on January 21, 2006 10:56 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Hmm, Bong, not sure that's fair. While I am sad about the turn Sir Ben's career has taken (and appreciate this post for informing me of it :)), I don't take issue with his characterization of his identity. I think it's pretty honest, actually.


 6 · Telegu love on January 22, 2006 12:32 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Gee this stinks for an Oscar winner and a damn good actor to do a film inspired by a video game.

BTW, a little something about the movie Gandhi. We are very fortunate the part went to someone who had some Indian heritage (on his father's side). Otherwise it would have gone to a white actor like Alec Guiness. To think producers wanted to cast a non-Indian to play Gandhiji. And I don't think Sir Ben needs to say much about his Indian heritage. His legacy and his identity is that one film. A damn good one for that matter.


 7 · Jay Singh on January 22, 2006 05:34 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Nice interview that Telugu love linked to:

The son of an Indian (Gujarati) physician Rahimtulla Harji Bhanji and British-Russian actress and fashion model Anna Lyna Mary Bhanji he was Krishna Bhanji until he changed his name to Ben Kingsley.
Born and raised in Yorkshire, England; Kingsley changed his name when he decided to act in films. “Interestingly it was my father who advised me to change my name as he believed that a British name would help me become more successful in films” says Kingsley adjusting his average frame in the seemingly uncomfortable chair.
“It’s a rather amusing name. While Krishna is the name of a Hindu God, Bhanji is typically a Muslim surname” he elucidates. Suddenly he laughs out and says, “The irony is that I changed my name from Krishna Bhanji to Ben Kingsley in order to play Mohandas Gandhi!”

 8 · Anil on January 22, 2006 05:34 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

The bloke's real name is Krishna Bhanji, his dad was a Kenyan of Indian descent and his mother a jew. He has played the role of a vampire before too.

Gee this stinks for an Oscar winner and a damn good actor to do a film inspired by a video game.

What is wrong with a film inspired by a video game? It is not that different from a film inspired by a novel. I am still waiting for a movie version of Grand Theft Auto.


 9 · Jay Singh on January 22, 2006 05:36 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Sorry, Nux2 linked to that interview :-)


 10 · Bong Breaker on January 22, 2006 08:30 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

Nice article Nux2. I stand (somewhat) corrected ;) Although, Telegu Love, I don't recall anyone like Alec Guinness being in the picture. The other person in the running to play Gandhi was Naseeruddin Shah - but it was understandable that the British crew and Dicky Attenborough wanted a Brit for simplicity's sake. Indians were quite irritated by the decision at first, but most were pacified when they saw what a fantastic performance Kingsley turned in. I think Naseeruddin Shah did end up playing Gandhi though - in Hey Ram. The lamest thing was when Christopher Lee was cast as Jinnah, years after Gandhi was made.


 11 · Jay Singh on January 22, 2006 09:21 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)


I think most Indians were happy about Ben Kingsley when they realised that he had Gujarati blood in his veins. That makes him kin to Gandhi in a way.

I think it is amazing when you watch his performance in Sexy Beast as the most scary and vicious psychopath of recent British cinema, then realise the range that he has an actor - really great actor.


 12 · DesiDancer on January 22, 2006 11:01 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

even as a vampire, he's rockin some nice zari brocade and silks in the above picture.


 13 · webby on January 22, 2006 07:52 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

If Kingsley is so desperate for money, then he should star in some Bollywood flicks.


 14 · Sluggo on January 23, 2006 02:46 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

I unfortunately have seen both 'Alone in the Dark' and 'Bloodrayne'. The are truly extremely bad movies. I really don't know how they convince good actors to get in on; but once they do - it's like they are turned into zombies. 'Bloodrayne' is just unbelievably awful...it still hurts to think about it..


 15 · bea arthur on January 24, 2006 08:19 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)
There comes a time in every knighted actor’s career when he descends from Oscar material to B-level creature feature.

Thats one gorgeous sentence. Great writing.


 16 · Dhampir on January 25, 2006 02:57 PM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)


In the DVD commentary of 'Alone in the Dark', Boll explains how he funds his films:

"Maybe you know it but it's not so easy to finance movies in total. And the reason I am able to do these kind of movies is I have a tax shelter fund in Germany and if you invest in a movie in Germany you get basically fifty percent back from the Government."

( from Uwe Bolls Wikipedia Page )

DHAUM.50% of the money B A C K!!!!
My heart goes out to the Ramsays .They never had it so good!

Boll has already completed a movie based on the hit Microsoft RPG title Dungeon Seige, titled..Gasp...
In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale.
And guess what . Bolls at it again.The starcast of this movie is as stellar as his earlier duds.
Its got Ray Liotta , JASON STATHAM ,Ron 'hellboy' Perlman and Burt Reynolds!

Im just gonna pray and hope that the movie aint as half as awful as bloodrayne.
And I thought that kisna was the worst movie of 2005.



 17 · Ben on August 18, 2006 05:04 AM · Direct link · “Quote”(?)

There is only one way that directors manage to lure actors of Ben Kingsley's callibre into such poor films, and that is money.
Mr Kingsley should really work on the stage more, for many of his parts don't use his great talent to its full potential. He, as any great actor, can give much greater performances on the stage than on film.


Add a comment
         
 
   
   
 
Remember me?   

To prevent comment spam, please type the word brown below:


Note: Please don't feed the trolls. Requests for celebrities' contact info or homework assistance; racist, abusive, illiterate, content-free or commercial comments; personal, non-issue-focused flames; intolerant or anti-secular comments; and long, obscure rants may be deleted. Unless they’re funny. It’s all good then.

   
If you don't see your comment yet:
Wait 15 seconds and refresh your browser, don't post a duplicate.